• Home
  • About Me
  • Selected Writings
    • News Features
    • Travel Articles
    • Music Writing
    • Film/Celeb Interviews
    • Sport Features
    • Miscellaneous
  • Photography
  • Video Clips
  • Blog
  • Contact/Links
Kris Griffiths

Grammarly: 50 Shades of Bullshit

13/3/2015

13 Comments

 
Grammarly head in hands

​Since the turn of the year I’ve noticed the increasing presence of a company called Grammarly in my social media feeds, from friends thumbs-upping the service on FB to retweets of its stock language memes on Twitter. 

For anyone unaware of it, Grammarly’s basically a grammar-checking app which, while appearing to be just a fancier version of Microsoft Word’s built-in document reviewer, actually bills itself “the world’s most accurate grammar checker”, helping “more than 3 million writers...perfect their written English” (monthly fee $29.95).

That’s an impressive claim. It may well be the world's best grammar checker, but that's not necessarily saying much because it turns out the platform isn't that accurate – reviews have shown that Grammarly regularly misses clear mistakes in checked documents, while flagging errors that don't exist.
​
That was never going to bother me as I'd never use it anyway, and wasn't going to pay to give it a go out of curiosity, so I was happy to see it recently publicise an infographic of its application of grammatical rules, entitled ‘Fifty Shades of Grammar’ to tie in with the release of the eponymous movie. 
Fifty Shades of Grammarly
It had basically gone through the whole of E.L James’ work, highlighted what it considered the ‘worst’ grammatical errors, and then – this is the masterstroke – contended that there are similar "gaffes" strewn through classic literature, from  Austen to Shakespeare, supposedly proving that Fifty Shades wasn’t so badly written after all.

Let’s take a look at some of the gaffes they found. 
Nicholas Sparks & Ernest Hemingway
A pair of humdingers to get started. In its opening two lines of scholarly instruction Grammarly already manages to balls up twice: ‘Punctuation errors in complex sentences’ it titles this Nicholas Sparks ‘error’, before counselling that “E.L James is not the first author to include a comma...when a semi-colon would be more appropriate”. 

The complex sentence? “I am a common man with common thoughts and I’ve led a common life.”  Apparently Sparks needed to insert a comma after "thoughts" for it to make sense. 

Hold on – isn’t this supposed to be an instance of a comma being used “when a semicolon would be more appropriate”? That’s a double-fail before we even get to the point that no, a comma is not required in such a basic sentence of two short clauses. 

Neither is one required in the Hemingway example – and on top of that, if you are going to insert a comma where Grammarly has stuck one in, then you’d need another one too, ie. “have our books and, at night, be warm in bed together”. 

Non-solutions for non-problems are what Grammarly are trying to sell here.
Louis De Bernieres
Ok, so this next one (I’m not gonna do all of them) concerns ‘colloquialisms’, just like the “gonna” I’ve just used – words that reflect an informal mode, be it direct speech or a blog like this one. And wouldn’t you know it, Grammarly’s chosen ‘gaffe’ passage from Captain Corelli’s Mandolin is direct speech so wouldn't require the corrections they’ve blotted it with. 

So no, you shouldn’t change “don’t” and “doesn’t” here to “do not” and “it does not” because in the real world that’s not how normal people speak to each other in conversation.
Boris Pasternak & William Shakespeare
Moving on, it starts getting weirder. Here they discuss ‘Determiners’, which “help writers to be specific about what they are talking about”. Now, if they’d practised what they preached here, they’d  know that ‘a’, ‘an’ and ‘the’ are actually called articles – a type of determiner – so they're breaching their own specificity advice before even getting to the supposed error. 

And what a surreal crock it turns out to be, with the infographic declaring that “down to earth” should be corrected to “down to the earth”, because, clearly, the original phrase just isn’t specific enough. So in Grammarly’s alien world someone might describe themself as a “down-to-the-earth guy”, whose favourite film might be 'The Man Who Fell to The Earth'? 

And as for the following Tempest example, yeah fuck Shakespeare’s poetic verse and iambic pentameter, we need to help readers better visualise what he’s saying. And to do so, we’ll actually trash it by introducing an error where there wasn’t one before: “We are such stuff on which dreams are made on”. Two ons - sorted. 
Jane Austen 'error'
I'd like to say "last and definitely least" here, but it's difficult to decide what's the worst piece of advice. Grammarly wraps things up with a decree that Mr Darcy’s perfectly acceptable line “My feelings will not be repressed” in Pride and Prejudice should be completely overhauled due to the passive voice's “lack of clarity”. 

Which begs the question: on what planet is the original line unclear? Only in an alien world of demented anality so far away that no telescope could ever spot it. That’s where Grammarly lives. 

Its infographic is the linguistic equivalent of scare tactics used by certain political parties or tabloids to frighten the public with illusory problems. And less confident people will unfortunately swallow it and hand over their $30 a month and actually become poorer writers because of it. 

At best, Grammarly's service is better than nothing, for those who don’t have access to Microsoft Word or an equivalent, or for those who might want a second opinion, maybe for students double-checking an important essay. But as for claims of being the world's leading grammar authority helping people “perfect their written English”, on this evidence it’s a sham and a scam that should be given as wide a berth as possible.

If I ran this blog post through its programme it would probably flag that last line as the passive voice and not clear enough in meaning or something. I just wish its creators would come down to the earth!


Liked this? Read this: A Week in Israel with Britain's Biggest Bullshitter

13 Comments
James
15/3/2015 01:51:58 am

If none of the above dissuades people from using this service, then surely the barefaced conceitedness of trying to rectify the works of Shakespeare, Austen, Hemingway etc. should do.
Absolutely disgraceful.

Reply
Kris Griffiths
15/3/2015 02:37:10 am

Yeah, that too!

Reply
God link
16/2/2019 02:51:56 pm

Can someone tell grammarly to fuck off? thank you.

Reply
Kat
13/2/2017 06:37:05 am

Personally, I do think 50 Shades was poorly written. I gave up reading it after twenty pages because I wanted a red pen. However, Grammarly is crazy. I can only think they were trying for an Oxford comma in the first example, but it still seems daft. I'll stick with my brain and the odd Google search if I am really struggling.

Reply
assignment writing link
26/7/2017 11:51:39 am

English language is not easy and we need to learn the grammar. Punctuation and sentences are helpful to teach us English. But it is not tough for English countries.

Reply
nein danke
29/10/2017 10:40:31 am

All countries are English countries.

Reply
dah link
22/4/2018 09:33:12 pm

dah!!!!!!

Jackson Pollock Square
29/10/2017 10:38:50 am

I would be more annoyed if the service actually worked.

Reply
Maxual Interjaction link
29/10/2017 10:43:47 am

<img src="https://i.imgur.com/mSmdnyB.gif" alt="Grammarly">

Reply
fuck grammarly link
26/1/2018 08:51:34 am

FUCK GRAMMARLY FUCKER FUCKER FUCKER MOTHERFUCKER FUCK GRAMMARLY... I write a 4 word sentence just to test it and it says : "wordy sentence" in advanced. I don't pay for it, I have the free version, but I know that was about that sentence. Why does grammarly fuck up the customers that wont pay like that? Grammarly IS NOT FREE. DO NOT USE IT. IT IS NOT FREE!

Reply
Alpatron
7/4/2018 09:44:36 am

I actually rather like Grammarly; it's much better than the spell checker Microsoft Word has. But you can't take it at face value—a grammar checker is only an assistive tool, so its spottings should be taken as mere advice and not commandments.

Reply
Noel
25/8/2019 04:06:32 pm

Grammarly is not a spell checker. Only wizards and witches use those. It is a spelling and grammar checker, and far from being the best one.

Reply
Tom
28/1/2020 01:18:46 pm

In your opening example they are not short clauses but complete sentences! Therefore the comma is required. Both contain subjects and verbs.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Journalism
    Life
    Music
    Photography
    Sport
    Technology
    Video Creations

    Archives

    April 2020
    February 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    July 2017
    January 2017
    July 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    RSS Feed

(c) Kris Griffiths 2020 
Proudly powered by Weebly